Timeline for Exchange security guidance (not cross posting, just making you aware)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 at 8:57 | comment | added | the-wabbit | FWIW, there already is cross-site promotion by the means of "hot questions". Obviously, you have very little influence over what is appearing there as the question's owner. As the number of sites has increased and keeps increasing, the need for cross-site promotion will continue to rise, so maybe it is going to be implemented one day. | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:44 | comment | added | makerofthings7 | Understood. I'll leave this open for a while longer and won't abuse this experiment (e.g. trying to use this meta question as a guise to cross post my Sec.SE question). I'm mostly looking for any dissenting opinions and whatever they come up with. | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:36 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | See faq for details on what is supposed to be posted here. Network wide changes are announced on the blog and mSO, but their site rules don't apply (past being the basis for mSF's rules...) | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:34 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | The cross-site thing has been brought up before, debated, tons of proposals (including mine, a hierarchical solution), and declined. And the sites have proliferated... It's not a new problem by any means, and you're not the first to be annoyed by it. If you can get SE to change I'd be impressed and in your debt. | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:29 | comment | added | makerofthings7 | I agree that I would get + or - votes on cross site promotion here on meta, but never saw an official statement on that. By official, I mean meta.StackOverflow, since the rules of meta.SO or blog.stackexchange seem to take precedent over meta. | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:27 | comment | added | makerofthings7 | I think there should be a way to do cross site promotion. If meta isn't the place, and chatroom is too noisy; this is a problem area that can be solved with enough thought. | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 | history | answered | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |