Timeline for Why are moderators/high rep users focused on narrowing the scope of SF?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 20:57 | comment | added | Rob Moir | Actually I think I am. The 'LOL we can't internet' guy is asking for help after all. The question remains: Where do we draw the line? If its obvious that pure dross needs to go and obvious that great questions need to stay then so much for the obvious cases, but all our questions are somewhere on a scale between them. Now that we've established you believe in a quality bar, we're negotiating where to you set the bar. It needs to be a fairly precise and concise value too, so that people can stand some kind of chance of applying it consistently. | |
| Aug 20, 2013 at 20:06 | comment | added | JamesRyan | You are not talking about the same type of question that I am. Obviously pure dross needs to go. We are talking about scope. | |
| Aug 20, 2013 at 19:41 | history | edited | Rob Moir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 19:31 | history | answered | Rob Moir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |