Timeline for Sure, we like the IDEA of voting, but we are poor in our actions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2013 at 16:01 | comment | added | user9517 | @syneticon-dj: Even better; I must have been drunk and sleepy - looks like I was using the weekly page but you're right the number of truly active people is tiny. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 15:44 | comment | added | the-wabbit | For me, the all-time rep league stats page is saying "200+ | 6,415". It's not much, but the others seem to be anonymous users. I would think the active base of regular SF users is << 200, so it is not surprising that we do not see many votes. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 13:09 | comment | added | user9517 | @TheCleaner: Oops must have been sleepy when I wrote that it's nearer 1500 but sill tiny. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 13:06 | history | edited | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2013 at 13:02 | comment | added | TheCleaner |
there are ~450 people whose total reputation is >200 out of 139000 people who have used the site - to me that's a pretty shocking stat. If you had said total rep > 1k, I might see that, but 200 is so easy to reach even if you just stick around a week. Course, that said, I would bet for every new question here it is a >80% chance of it being someone that's been a member since "Today".
|
|
| Sep 30, 2013 at 20:48 | history | edited | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 151 characters in body
|
| Sep 30, 2013 at 20:31 | history | answered | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |