Timeline for Serial close-voting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2013 at 16:42 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | If one person (M) casts an initial vote to close and then a lot someone's (S) questions do get closed, leading to them being question banned, that's probably a good thing. If a bunch of /Reviewers end up closing enough of S's questions to get S banned, then S should either ask better questions or contribute more answers. | |
| Oct 16, 2013 at 23:29 | comment | added | Magellan | It's possible. I don't know how it works either. Perhaps there needs to be more repercussion for primarily posting questions that more closely resemble a steaming pile. | |
| Oct 16, 2013 at 23:25 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | Wouldn't an unintended side effect of this be question banning the user? The system is nebulous enough that we never know when it'll happen | |
| Oct 15, 2013 at 15:34 | vote | accept | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | ||
| Oct 15, 2013 at 15:33 | history | edited | Magellan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Duh
|
| Oct 15, 2013 at 15:26 | history | answered | Magellan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |