Timeline for Pretty low standard for "constructive" comments
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 12:54 | comment | added | user9517 | I can understand the workflow issue but decling flags cast in good faith (without explanation) is absolutely the wrong thing to do and should be avoided as it teaches the wrong behaviours. The September 2011 moderator news letter has details on this. Please pass it on to your moderation colleague so they can be educated. | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 0:57 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | @voretaq7 I don't have a tape robot. I move the tapes myself... Speaking of which, I'm overdue for my October backup. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 18:06 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @ChrisS Old softy you are. Next you'll be recovering the users files from the tapes instead of having them arm-wrestle with the tape robot for their data. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 18:03 | comment | added | EEAA | Oh, and in regards to Crash Override being a lunkhead. Agreed 100%. However, that doesn't mean we need to reciprocate. Like I said in my Q, just VTC and be done with it. If one feels a need to leave a comment, it should be polite, civil, and respectful. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 18:02 | comment | added | EEAA | Makes sense, and thanks for the explanation about the mechanics of comment flag moderation. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 18:01 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Note: I unzotted the question, scrubbed the comments, and left something constructive. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 18:00 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |