Timeline for Serverfault mods on a higher horse than stackoverflow (closing questions)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2015 at 21:07 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @Pacerier "Google It!" (literally what's in the clip) | |
| May 18, 2015 at 17:32 | comment | added | Pacerier | @voretaq7, What is that video about? | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 18:55 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | I recall we were closing huge #s of migrated questions, I don't know if us rabble were told about overall close rates. In any case, I think the harsh "environment" that the OP commented on is more a matter of perception. | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 18:49 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @Ward Without divulging numbers, the last time I prodded the SE folks for data SF's closure rate (% questions closed) is higher than e.g. Stack Overflow's by a statistically significant margin. (Now as to whether or not that makes us "mean" or just particularly vigilant at weeding our walled garden I really can't say. I don't think we're particularly "mean" with regard to closures, but the ♦ next to my name means I'm by definition a biased insider...) | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 18:06 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | I have to admit I haven't read your whole answer before commenting, but your first response is wrong: ServerFault is NOT faster/harsher about closing questions. Every single meta-site I follow (especially meta.SO) is full of complaints about "you guys are too mean, you close questions to fast." SF is no different. | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:22 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |