Timeline for On the paucity of voting
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2014 at 7:46 | comment | added | MadHatter | Addressing points 5/6 in the Resolutions section, you might conside the virtues of tabbed browers. My standard technique for dealing with queues is to middle-click on each question, to open it in a new browser tab. I then review the question in that tab, where it gets a whole screenful as you want, up/downvote if I see fit, and make a decision about closure. I then close the tab, which returns me to the queue tab, and vote accordingly. Lather, rinse, repeat - and it adds about half a second per question. | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 7:27 | comment | added | user9517 | Just vote as you see fit and if that makes a regular sit up and think so be it. TBH most of the regulars (at which this question is aimed and who are being shy at coming forward) either wouldn't notice a DV or would go and investigate and improve/withdraw as required. I can't say I've ever seen a regular get truly irritated by a DV either. Don't let someone 'beating you to it' put you off either IME your answers are usually more vote-worthy than others and will over time accrue more votes. | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 0:47 | comment | added | EEAA | On the last paragraph of your "Answers" section. I sure hope this isn't truly holding you back from voting. As you say, they're stupid points. If you see one of the regulars give a clunker of an answer, slap a dv on that sucker and tell them why. Chris S did just that to an incorrect answer I made earlier today, and I'm very glad he did it. Don't worry about alienating me or anyone else. Do what's right for the site, and all will be elevated because of it. | |
| Jun 30, 2014 at 23:07 | history | edited | Matthew Ife | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2014 at 22:58 | history | answered | Matthew Ife | CC BY-SA 3.0 |