Timeline for Is useful 'spam', really spam?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2014 at 13:13 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | Well thats why its number 3. However that's a paraphrase of the rules on self promotion, and how its generally enforced. If someone posts great specific answers, or answers questions on $product well enough, no one might mind. | |
| Aug 28, 2014 at 13:08 | comment | added | Cristian Ciupitu | +1 even if I disagree with item 3. What matters is the quality of the answer, not who gave it. | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 14:06 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | Downvotes do the trick, as would flagging if its spammy. | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 14:05 | comment | added | Jacob Tomlinson | I agree. It would be nice if such a post cost rep. Then they would have to genuinely contribute to the community in order to post it. Although enforcing this would be difficult. | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 21:56 | comment | added | user9517 | There are people who walk this tightrope well, most don manage it al all though. | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 14:34 | history | answered | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |