Timeline for 2014 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2014 at 18:29 | comment | added | Adi Inbar |
Yeah, I don't think the issue is lack of clarity, it's an almost total lack of experience, both here and in the SE network in general. And some of the answers demonstrate that lack of experience. @masegaloeh's comment gives some examples. Also: will you continue to delve the review-queues at your current rate? Since my current rate is "none" or "what's a review queue", I'd say yes. I will continue at my current pace. Do you really think that saying, effectively, "I've never done a review before and I don't plan to start" really sells you as a mod candidate? ;)
|
|
| Nov 27, 2014 at 15:04 | comment | added | masegaloeh |
I don't know why (1) less than two tags, (2) no example code, (3) poorly formatted was indicator that OP doesn't write a good question. Point (1) likely wasn't valid indicator because many good question has only single tag. We can edit to include relevant tags tough. Point (2) wasn't a bit confused me because we aren't SO, and we need configuration instead code. Point (3) can't be fixed by edit though. Maybe OP doesn't know how to write in Markdown. Single edit will help OP familiarize himself with formatting
|
|
| Nov 27, 2014 at 9:16 | comment | added | user | no site meta questions, a single main site question (voted +2), your highest main site answer is voted +4 (not terrible), and you have virtually no Meta Stack Exchange participation. Could you please elaborate on how you feel this shows you as an active member of the community, rather than just a relatively casual (judging by your visible activity) user of the site? | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 9:15 | comment | added | user | You have 0 helpful out of 0 total flags according to the nominee list, and as of now have voted a grand total of 16 times since you joined the site a bit over a year ago according to your profile. Yet you claim to read everything and "vote/flag accordingly". At 434 rep currently, you don't even have access to the low-requirement review queues ("access review queues" privilege requires 500 rep). You have two site meta answers (the one other than this net voted -4, so not exactly violent agreement from the community), (continued) | |
| Nov 26, 2014 at 15:09 | comment | added | Signal15 | @JonEricson I've removed the IP-ban & reverse-captcha ideas. Regardless of intent, I'm not intending to troll. | |
| Nov 26, 2014 at 15:07 | history | edited | Signal15 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed "IP-ban Asia" & reverse-CAPTCHA comments. Regardless of intent, it sounds troll-ish and that's not the point of my post
|
| Nov 25, 2014 at 20:51 | comment | added | Basil | We are posting comments in a troll answer | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 19:50 | comment | added | Signal15 | Yikes. -5? Perhaps I should clarify some of my answers. If anyone has any feedback, it'd be nice. | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 18:16 | history | answered | Signal15 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |