Timeline for Notification of edit by the author on a post you downvote
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 4, 2014 at 22:44 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @Reaces Yeah I'd leave it. The problem with having meta.SE and meta.EverythingElse is it's often hard to find the previous iterations of requests (I'm usually awful at it, but this came up in a separate conversation a while back so I happened to remember there was a MetaMeta post about it) | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 19:49 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | I'd leave it as is. Its pretty hard to know everything that's happened everywhere. | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 17:27 | comment | added | Reaces | My point was simply that I did try to look around before posting all-be-it poorly (apparently) how would you suggest I proceed? Delete the post? Add a link to the previous proposal? Nothing? | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 17:24 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @Sven Sadly SE is not a democracy, but a benevolent dictatorship ruled by a tightly held governing body. (Given how poorly democratic rule works online - there being only one example I can think of where it worked at all - my "Sadly" may be a bit sarcastic: There are plenty of BAD ideas that had lots of community support which I'm happy to see declined.) | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 17:13 | comment | added | Sven Mod | Jeff declined everything he didn't get or like, regardless of user votes. I so hoped things would improve after he departed, but others picked up right where he stopped :( | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 16:40 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @Reaces It's been proposed a few times over the years with various wordings, that's just the first one I found. Clearing downvotes like Dennis suggested has also come up and been shot down (but I think the reasons there were more sound: Computers can't tell if the edit fixes the problems, and clearing votes for any edit (even just on a closed question) is rife for abuse. | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 16:27 | vote | accept | Reaces | ||
| Dec 4, 2014 at 16:27 | comment | added | Reaces | I had not seen that post. Probably because theres a difference in wording and implementation. But the thought seems the same. | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 16:22 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |