Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#What about development?

What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. That made relevant questions for system administrators supporting a DevOps infrastrcuture on-topic. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. That made relevant questions for system administrators supporting a DevOps infrastrcuture on-topic. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services

What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. That made relevant questions for system administrators supporting a DevOps infrastrcuture on-topic. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services
added 95 characters in body
Source Link
HBruijn
  • 82.5k
  • 25
  • 41

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered with our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. That made relevant questions for system administrators supporting a DevOps infrastrcuture on-topic. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered with our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. That made relevant questions for system administrators supporting a DevOps infrastrcuture on-topic. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services
added 36 characters in body
Source Link
HBruijn
  • 82.5k
  • 25
  • 41

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered with theour focus on operations and production systemsystems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that covered with the focus on operations and production system requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services

#What about development?

That is currently excluded together with the home environment, but that exclusions is omitted in your draft. Setting up development environments is explicitly on-topic in Stack Overflow and has been off-topic on ServerFault. But...

There is the DevOps trend that works well for start-ups and more and more enterprises think that is therefore also a suitable model for them.

I think we had that overlap with SO covered with our focus on operations and production systems requirements that were in previous versions of site scope/guidelines. But those are also no longer there.


  • working with services hosting or enabling your information technology

I think that is lacking the requirement for having administrative control, we expect people to have access to both configuration settings and the ability to change them if required.

If you want to keep it simple but have a generic include of "such-and-such as-a-service" use the overhyped cloud terminology.

  • managing your organisations IT cloud services
Source Link
HBruijn
  • 82.5k
  • 25
  • 41
Loading