Timeline for Is SF's "good question range" too narrow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2014 at 8:45 | comment | added | JamesRyan | A sysadmin's goal is working toward higher efficiency, clearly a mod's role here is to work towards the day when no question will be left on topic and they are all diverted with the smallest input. :) | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 5:09 | comment | added | user65237 | There is a wide gap between what the rules of the site are and how the rules are followed. I've seen many on-topic questions get moved to a less appropriate site, closed, downvoted, etc. not because they violated the rules, but because one or a few people didn't like them. In other words, even if you follow the rules to the letter, chances are high that you (or your questions/answers) will get penalized regardless. | |
| Dec 26, 2014 at 9:29 | comment | added | AD7six | The pee-wee herman rule is an interesting read on the topic of where to post questions. | |
| Dec 26, 2014 at 0:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/548279931499974656 | ||
| Dec 19, 2014 at 20:13 | vote | accept | c4urself | ||
| Dec 19, 2014 at 18:31 | comment | added | Sven Mod | One thing to consider is that migrating a question is not necessarily bad if you can get better help on another site. I prefer a well thought out question that get migrated to e.g. DBA.SE over a crappy "Halp. My exchange iz kaput". | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 18:10 | history | edited | c4urself | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarifying
|
| Dec 19, 2014 at 18:10 | answer | added | Nathan C | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 17:53 | answer | added | HopelessN00bMod | timeline score: 15 | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 17:53 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 17:45 | history | asked | c4urself | CC BY-SA 3.0 |