Timeline for Recent changes of site moderation behavior
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:38 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Yes, and you will get the data - next time. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:36 | comment | added | Jenny D | @PeterHorvath I do not know that there was a change in behaviour. Your subjective experience of the site does not match mine. The front page constantly changes, the questions that catch my eye are not the same as those that catch yours. The only way to know if something has changed is by looking at the data. I am sorry that you see such a request for information as being hostile - if you think that asking for information to clarify the facts means that this is not a "healthy environment", then I do not think that you and I will ever agree on anything regarding this site,. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:18 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Actually, the best argument will be behind my statements in the eyes of the future visitors: in a healthy environment, a such question as mine never gets this reaction as it got. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:16 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD No, there was a change in the behavior of the mods, you also know this, I also know this. But you won't admit this, but are handling this question as a false accuse. But there wasn't accusation, there was only a question. And, of course, there isn't any data, how the hell could I have to think I get a such hostile reaction back? If I knew that, I had started this whole thread absolutely other ways! It is so simple. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:13 | comment | added | Jenny D | @PeterHorvath I shall be very interested in seeing those facts, though I wish you did not see the need to "accuse". Simply showing the data, such as statistics and links to questions, would give other people a basis for response. In this question, all you've given us is your subjective experience - which is insufficient basis for an objective evaluation of the issues. I do not see any reason why this should involve accusations or conflict. Again, I have never said that you are wrong, only that I have no way of knowing if you are right. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD There was factual basis. You could have simply explain, why are you doing this. I probably didn't agree with all of the changes, but there hadn't been a conflict. And now, back to work, bye. Next time I will be harder (f.e. I will have "facts", and I will accuse based on them - it seems this is the only way in which we can communicate). | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:04 | comment | added | Jenny D | @PeterHorvath From my side there is no conflict. I have repeatedly asked for information, which you do not provide. There can be neither conflict nor consensus as long as there is not even a factual basis for discussion. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 11:03 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD You are right, thank you. I stop the communication in this thread, because you are handling this as a conflict, in which I won't take part. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 10:59 | comment | added | Jenny D | @PeterHorvath I think this is another language problem. "I stop this thread" reads to me like "I am stopping this whole thread and nobody should write anything more in it" - which is clearly not working. If what you mean is "I will stop writing in this thread", then that is a choice that anyone can make at anytime. I think you should be aware that often when people disagree with you it may simply be because what you wrote does not express what you mean. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 10:54 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Well, actually I could continue, but this is probably not what you want, and also not what I want. Now I won't conflict with you, I didn't gave a reason for you to this behavior (my original post wasn't attacking), so I won't communicate in this thread with the exception to mention, that I stepped out. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 10:53 | comment | added | Jenny D | @PeterHorvath You cannot unilaterally stop a thread (except by deleting the question). If you ask a question, and other people are interested in it, they will and should contribute their ideas and points of view. That is the whole point of the StackExchange sites - that questions and answers should be useful for more than just the person asking them. I believe that a failure to understand this leads to things such as demanding that bad questions be left open even though they are useful to at most one person. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 10:35 | comment | added | peterh | @Reaces Read again: "I stop this thread". Understood? Thanks. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 9:12 | comment | added | Reaces | @PeterHorvath I would like to add that the elections happened way to recently to really get a good picture on the effects of the new mods. Giving them some time to get accustomed to their new way of interacting with SF, keeping in mind that these are people with additional full-time employment. I think gathering some statistics over the coming months could be useful. However immediately naming and shaming (sort of) two mods right after the holiday period, just 2 months (barely) after the elections? Too much, too soon. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:45 | comment | added | peterh | I don't want conflict, I only asked things, with peace, this is because I stop this thread. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:37 | comment | added | Jenny D | I do not understand that comment at all. I have no idea who you are referring to as mods/powerusers, whom you think is feeling accused. It is true that I don't want clash; in the context of your question, what I want is specific data rather than your personal impression. I have no idea what your wishes are. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:20 | vote | accept | peterh | ||
| Jan 31, 2015 at 16:09 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:14 | comment | added | Jenny D | I am saying that I have no way of knowing whether they happened or not. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:13 | comment | added | peterh | Ok. So, you say the changes I mentioned simply didn't happen? | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:11 | history | answered | Jenny D | CC BY-SA 3.0 |