Timeline for How to deal with people that don't accept your reasoning?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2015 at 8:22 | comment | added | peterh | @JamesHaigh It was part of a more complex URL. Currently, I also can't see that. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 8:07 | comment | added | James Haigh | “Your domain name it already visible in the page history. Your first version contained the textual domain name.” – Here's the page history. Where abouts is the textual domain name in the first revision? | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:28 | comment | added | peterh | @BigHomie Thank you very much the first objective downvote in this thread. :-) | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:27 | comment | added | peterh | @Sven I didn't know this, thank you. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | peterh | @BE77Y Okay, understood. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:24 | comment | added | BE77Y | @peterh I think what he's expressing is that this has gone on too long and that your single vote isn't really the point of contention here. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:19 | comment | added | peterh | @EEAA Sorry, I don't understand. Maybe you want to say I shouldn't change my vote? This is what I will do. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:10 | comment | added | Sven Mod | And revisions aren't indexed by Google as well, see meta.stackexchange.com/questions/57277/… | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 15:06 | comment | added | MDMoore313 | -1, The Google crawler doesn't recognize text contained in images. If you must use images for textual content, consider using the ALT attribute to include a few words of descriptive text. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:48 | comment | added | EEAA | @peterh Quit holding your one, single vote over the OPs head. Just move on. You are making yourself look really bad. Just leave it be. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:47 | comment | added | peterh | @Gaia Ok. Then you want from me to change my vote, or won't? (I ask this fifth time from you.) | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:41 | comment | added | Gaia | Of course I do, but I am done discussing with you. Thank you for your oh-so-kind help with my privacy concerns by downvoting my question after inserting the FQDN into it 3 times. BTW 1: I didn't put the text in there the 1st time around. BTW 2: That is not the logo, pull up the site and see. BTW 3: If that's a well designed image I feel sorry for your sense of aesthetics. BTW 4: Meet my designer, text2image.com | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:39 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Well, maybe. And what do you think? Do this company logo have a good place there? | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:38 | comment | added | peterh | @Gaia Do you understand my question? | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:36 | comment | added | Jenny D | @peterh You made the same edit three times. That is a bit excessive. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:33 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Would you check the edit log again? | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:32 | comment | added | Jenny D | @peterh If you didn't want conflict, you could have stopped the edit war a bit earlier. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:28 | comment | added | peterh | @Gaia Honestly, I never wanted to make a such scandal from that. I've seen a logo, I quickly removed it, that was all. I also never wanted conflict with you. I ask again: do you really want this question to be well-indexed by the google, or not? (If I change my vote, it will be!) | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 14:17 | comment | added | Gaia | Ah! You thought I was trying to use my "big and well-designed" image to market my client's website. Now it all makes sense, to me and to at least 4 other ppl here. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 13:45 | history | answered | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |