Timeline for Getting downvotes on personal ground
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2015 at 9:45 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Yes, it wasn't, but it was very similar. The second half of your comment: exactly. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 9:42 | comment | added | Jenny D | @peterh It wasn't a logo, and it wasn't big. What it is, though, is a good example of an unneeded conflict. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 1:36 | comment | added | peterh | I think the "silent disagreement" behavior is reasonable only to avoid unneeded conflicts, and not to leave bad things as they are. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 0:32 | comment | added | peterh | Well, tolerating a big company logo in a question, only to be able to disapprove me... it is comic :-) | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 0:22 | vote | accept | peterh | ||
| Mar 17, 2015 at 19:34 | comment | added | Reaces | Because of the way down votes have a much smaller impact than up votes, it's quite likely that all the extra attention still ends up with a net positive result. I'm not sure silently disagreeing would be needed. Unless the content of his answers / questions is beyond horrible. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 16:24 | history | answered | SvenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |