Skip to main content
nope, totally wrong
Source Link
Andrew B
  • 33.5k
  • 15
  • 31

Even if there are questionsEven if there are questions in [restore] that are not related to backups, the tag excerpt is unambiguous: (Actually, I interpreted the tag dates wrong. The tag has been around for five years, but the tag wiki was only applied in 2012.)

This has been the description of that are not related to backups,for the tag excerpt is unambiguouslast three years:

Returning data from a backup to its original location or to its successor.

WhileI'm inclined to say that the nameintended use of thethis tag is ambiguous,has been unambiguous for the majority of its intended use is not;lifetime, barring the tag was created on 2012/6/15 and this description was appliedusual case where someone types restore whatever into the same daylist of tags. I suggest mergingAliasing the tags and changing tag to an alias.

(Ironically, has no tag wiki description at all. The name says it all thoughseems to make sense and would prevent further creep of unintended usage.)

Even if there are questions in that are not related to backups, the tag excerpt is unambiguous:

Returning data from a backup to its original location or to its successor.

While the name of the tag is ambiguous, its intended use is not; the tag was created on 2012/6/15 and this description was applied the same day. I suggest merging the tags and changing to an alias.

(Ironically, has no tag wiki description at all. The name says it all though.)

Even if there are questions in [restore] that are not related to backups, the tag excerpt is unambiguous: (Actually, I interpreted the tag dates wrong. The tag has been around for five years, but the tag wiki was only applied in 2012.)

This has been the description of for the last three years:

Returning data from a backup to its original location or to its successor.

I'm inclined to say that the intended use of this tag has been unambiguous for the majority of its lifetime, barring the usual case where someone types restore whatever into the list of tags. Aliasing the tag to seems to make sense and would prevent further creep of unintended usage.

Source Link
Andrew B
  • 33.5k
  • 15
  • 31

Even if there are questions in that are not related to backups, the tag excerpt is unambiguous:

Returning data from a backup to its original location or to its successor.

While the name of the tag is ambiguous, its intended use is not; the tag was created on 2012/6/15 and this description was applied the same day. I suggest merging the tags and changing to an alias.

(Ironically, has no tag wiki description at all. The name says it all though.)