Timeline for Flag declined on a question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2015 at 23:22 | vote | accept | yagmoth555Mod | ||
| Sep 15, 2015 at 23:13 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | I agree, gonna wait for my 3k to continue :) but SO team did it confusing as I did like 100 close vote and it show helpful in my profile, even if im lower of 3k, but you are right that all close question only show the 5 member that the vote counted (over 3k) | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 23:01 | comment | added | womble Mod | I don't feel witch-hunted, no harm done. The general "theme" of flagging is that it should be limited to cases where community moderators can't deal with something (converting non-answers to comments, deleting abusive/spammy comments) or where action has to be taken quickly or with "extra" authority (stopping on-going abuse, banning users, etc). | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 22:38 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | Thanks for your answer. I didnt know you did the review. I didnt mean to do a witchhunt there, so I appreciate your time. I maybe badly use the flag option. For me I use it only for community moderation, except case like spam or abuse. A example from another review I did is serverfault.com/questions/718937/centos-rootnologin. I flagged it the 5 sept, and was closed today. I just feel that it can somehow help to flag. My misinterpretation is maybe that Iam under 3k, the flag does maybe not mean the same | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 22:32 | vote | accept | yagmoth555Mod | ||
| Sep 15, 2015 at 23:22 | |||||
| Sep 15, 2015 at 22:22 | history | edited | wombleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarify my role in this
|
| Sep 15, 2015 at 20:54 | history | answered | wombleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |