Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

I would like to ask if for question that the OP told it work, but didnt marked it answered, if moderator's should mark it. As I seen the "Community" user keep them pooping in the active's question feed.

Latest example that was active today (because of Community's user)

Windows Server DHCP import/export scopes using netsh.exeWindows Server DHCP import/export scopes using netsh.exe (I didnt leave a note, but yes you need to erase before the import, like the OP's wrote)

What is the stance SF usually take on that ? as it's not the first time I seen such question ( unanswered, but answered :) )

I would like to ask if for question that the OP told it work, but didnt marked it answered, if moderator's should mark it. As I seen the "Community" user keep them pooping in the active's question feed.

Latest example that was active today (because of Community's user)

Windows Server DHCP import/export scopes using netsh.exe (I didnt leave a note, but yes you need to erase before the import, like the OP's wrote)

What is the stance SF usually take on that ? as it's not the first time I seen such question ( unanswered, but answered :) )

I would like to ask if for question that the OP told it work, but didnt marked it answered, if moderator's should mark it. As I seen the "Community" user keep them pooping in the active's question feed.

Latest example that was active today (because of Community's user)

Windows Server DHCP import/export scopes using netsh.exe (I didnt leave a note, but yes you need to erase before the import, like the OP's wrote)

What is the stance SF usually take on that ? as it's not the first time I seen such question ( unanswered, but answered :) )

Source Link
yagmoth555 Mod
  • 17.5k
  • 15
  • 23

Marking a old question answered when the OP told it's?

I would like to ask if for question that the OP told it work, but didnt marked it answered, if moderator's should mark it. As I seen the "Community" user keep them pooping in the active's question feed.

Latest example that was active today (because of Community's user)

Windows Server DHCP import/export scopes using netsh.exe (I didnt leave a note, but yes you need to erase before the import, like the OP's wrote)

What is the stance SF usually take on that ? as it's not the first time I seen such question ( unanswered, but answered :) )