Timeline for Why do people think questions about cPanel/WHM is the same as questions about cPanel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jan 30, 2016 at 8:14 | comment | added | MadHatter | @SanuelJackson comments are not the place for this - or any other - discussion. If you think you can make a cogent argument for a change in cPanel policy, I urge you to make it in the appropriate way: post a question to meta arguing your case, and see if you can win community support. I have made some recommendations about how I think this might be best done, but whether you heed them is of course up to you. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 8:10 | comment | added | Kraang Prime |
sorry -- the Not likely to fail meaning, your likely in likely to fail makes it sound like it's possible for acceptance of a cPanel question. I call bullshit as the fail rate is 100%. Doesn't matter how obscure, or how simple -- on hold/deleted/closed is the result for 100% of ALL cPanel questions. likely leaves open the possibility of fair assesment and inclusion at least some of the time.
|
|
| Jan 30, 2016 at 8:06 | comment | added | MadHatter | Sorry, @SanuelJackson; "not likely to fail" what? I applaud you for requesting deletion of your original question, but I note that you don't need to ask a mod to do it; you can delete your own question with the link at the base of it. As regards hearings, I agree with you; as I said, you can't expect such in comments - discussions are not what comments are for. If you think there's a question to be asked, here on meta, go ahead and ask it. It will likely go better if you show awareness of previous discussions on the subject, and try to show how things have changed since then. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 8:06 | comment | added | Kraang Prime | Regarding a hearing, I don't see this as a hearing when 'the community' (definition of that in question) is unwilling to discuss. As is showing in the recent onslaught of cPanel questions, and dating back, they have answers and good discussion before 50k'ers come along and disrupt the healthy responses with closing/on-hold, and pointing to something vague saying it isn't allowed, meanwhile exactly a 100% closure/on-hold/deletion rate. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 8:03 | comment | added | Kraang Prime | Not likely to fail -- 100% fail, and that was added as a comment on that tag by meta with appropriate privileges which is how much rep again ? I have requested deletion of my question on a highly censored topic, cPanel. And if it is so verboten, then please, unhijack the cpanel keyword and you will not have the onslaught of people asking questions which you think no one should ask and even when they are responded to, you think, no one wants to answer them. -- this is in general, not specific to you MadHatter. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 7:59 | history | answered | MadHatter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |