Return to Answer

replaced https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc with https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc

Source Link

edited Oct 7, 2021 at 7:34

RFC links

This is pretty obvious when you think about it, but still neat.

Example:

This is a link to [RFC 1796][1796].

So is [this][rfc1796].

[1796]: https://toolswww.ietfrfc-editor.org/htmlrfc/rfc1796    
[rfc1796]: https://toolswww.ietfrfc-editor.org/htmlrfc/rfc1796

Result:

This is a link to RFC 1796 RFC 1796.

So is this this.

RFC links

This is pretty obvious when you think about it, but still neat.

Example:

This is a link to [RFC 1796][1796].

So is [this][rfc1796].

[1796]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1796    
[rfc1796]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1796

Result:

This is a link to RFC 1796.

So is this.

RFC links

This is pretty obvious when you think about it, but still neat.

Example:

This is a link to [RFC 1796][1796].

So is [this][rfc1796].

[1796]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1796    
[rfc1796]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1796

Result:

This is a link to RFC 1796.

So is this.

Source Link

created Feb 12, 2016 at 19:15

Andrew B

33.5k
15
31

RFC links

This is pretty obvious when you think about it, but still neat.

Example:

This is a link to [RFC 1796][1796].

So is [this][rfc1796].

[1796]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1796    
[rfc1796]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1796

Result:

This is a link to RFC 1796.

So is this.