Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Answer

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Just approve it. Stack Exchange has made it clear that they think bumps are a good thingthey think bumps are a good thing, and don't care enough to code in a feature for no-bump editsdon't care enough to code in a feature for no-bump edits. If they wanted to have no-bump minor edits, they would, but they don't. The "too minor" edit rejection reason has even been removed, so there's your answer - they want it be improved and bumped.

Just approve it. Stack Exchange has made it clear that they think bumps are a good thing, and don't care enough to code in a feature for no-bump edits. If they wanted to have no-bump minor edits, they would, but they don't. The "too minor" edit rejection reason has even been removed, so there's your answer - they want it be improved and bumped.

Just approve it. Stack Exchange has made it clear that they think bumps are a good thing, and don't care enough to code in a feature for no-bump edits. If they wanted to have no-bump minor edits, they would, but they don't. The "too minor" edit rejection reason has even been removed, so there's your answer - they want it be improved and bumped.

Source Link
HopelessN00b
HopelessN00b
  • 54.1k
  • 3
  • 30
  • 56

Just approve it. Stack Exchange has made it clear that they think bumps are a good thing, and don't care enough to code in a feature for no-bump edits. If they wanted to have no-bump minor edits, they would, but they don't. The "too minor" edit rejection reason has even been removed, so there's your answer - they want it be improved and bumped.