Timeline for Moderator deleted my comment on his answer and wrongfully accused me of insult
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 9:16 | comment | added | naktinis | Fair, so should I repost this answer on the SE-wide meta question? | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 3:23 | comment | added | Andrew B | You were advised on meta.SE to discuss the specific circumstances of this dispute on our meta site, but as Sven has stated, your answer is re-framing this into the context of a SE-wide issue. You say that your question has not been tackled properly yet, while at the same time appearing to have a poor grasp of what the appropriate context for engagement actually is. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 21:24 | comment | added | Sven Mod | If you want to further discuss general mod issues, do this on Meta Stack Exchange, but don't force this on us. And please leave us out of it in general - nothing has happened that requires you dragging anyone into the spotlight. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 21:23 | comment | added | Sven Mod | I have quite a big problem with you now trying to frame the "questions" you brought up as general issues that SF or all of SE face (speaking only for SF, I don't think we do). Your post was clearly not "What can we do in general", but instead "I was mistreated by this SF mod, how can I deal with him". It should be clear by now that the core of your accusation "biased, unfair mod action and power abuse" is unfounded, because your comment absolutely warranted the mod action. This should resolve your question. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 16:41 | comment | added | naktinis | @Iain by mods I mean mods on all SE sites. Still no comment saying why this doesn't answer the question. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 16:39 | comment | added | user9517 | According to their profiles only one of the mods has been seen since you posted this 'answer' so I guess your hopes are not shattered. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 16:34 | comment | added | naktinis | It seems to be getting some downvotes, but I think this is a good answer to the questions. I really hope the downvotes are not from mods who act emotionally and feel personally insulted by my low point count in this meta site. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 16:29 | comment | added | naktinis | @Iain Yes, I understand that, though (from experience in StackOverflow etc.) sometimes they can be essential and even contain important parts of answers. That's not the question though. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 16:24 | comment | added | user9517 | People complain to SE about moderators all the time. I'm sure they have a bin to collect all the squitter in. Comments are 'ephemeral' or 'second class' as such very little time has been wasted on them and their curation. Every single comment could be removed from the site and the site should be no worse off without them. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 15:51 | history | answered | naktinis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |