Timeline for Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2016 at 23:39 | comment | added | EEAA Mod | I've unlocked the original QA, but it will remain closed. | |
| Jul 30, 2016 at 23:39 | comment | added | EEAA Mod | @kasperd The question was locked due to abusive comments by the OP. The question should remain closed as the OP refused to provide sufficient details on his situation so that the question could be answered. | |
| Jul 30, 2016 at 22:26 | comment | added | kasperd | I find it slightly problematic that as the question stands now it appears locked but with no evidence left showing that locking was the correct action. And in the current state of the question it isn't possible for the community to show its agreement or disagreement with the closure. | |
| Jul 15, 2016 at 18:14 | comment | added | Andrew B |
As a DNS professional, I am in agreement with EEAA. By ignoring multiple requests to name the CNAME records (in these comments and the original question), you have demonstrated that you are far more invested in attempting to publicly roast moderators who may have misunderstood your presentation of the problem than actually getting it solved. People cannot admit fault if you won't give them enough information to do so, and you are far too belligerent to have any form of meaningful interaction with. (as evidenced by this comment)
|
|
| Jul 12, 2016 at 21:01 | comment | added | Yeats | @MichaelHampton Trolling to ask what I'm getting a warning for? I see where this is going... | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 21:00 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | @Yeats Do not even think about trolling me again. | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 20:59 | comment | added | Yeats | @MichaelHampton Ah. What behavior, exactly? What am I getting a warning for? :) | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 20:58 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | @Yeats That's the sort of abusive behavior that got you into this mess in the first place. Stop it immediately. You will not get another warning. | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 20:58 | comment | added | Yeats | LOL! What's the point? Look what happens when I try to reach out. You can't fight corruption by asking the corrupt to change. | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 20:57 | comment | added | EEAA Mod | If you honestly feel I was abusive, use the below contact link to contact SE staff. They can see the deleted comments, and can contact me if they deem appropriate. | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 20:50 | comment | added | Yeats | You forget to mention that YOU were abusive and condescending, and that I merely followed suit with ONE off-handed remark. My question wasn't put on hold because "not enough details were provided", but because you couldn't answer it. | |
| Jul 12, 2016 at 20:49 | history | answered | EEAAMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |