Timeline for Do we consider Bitnami to fall under the cPanel close reason?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 5:22 | comment | added | HBruijn Mod | @RyanBabchishin: Yes, many AWS questions are on topic. | |
| Aug 5, 2016 at 1:37 | comment | added | Ryan Babchishin | And do AWS questions have a place here? | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 15:57 | comment | added | EEAA Mod | Agreed. IMHO bitnami questions don't have a place here. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 15:29 | comment | added | ceejayoz | OK, I'll plan to use the cPanel reason with a clarifying comment. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 15:27 | comment | added | HBruijn Mod | My search seems to be acting differently from yours as I get only 3 questions over the last month... Odd. - Although the arguments against bitnami as a one-click installer may be similar to those we use against control panels, that existing default close reason may be confusing to the OP without clarification. You can VtC with a custom reason instead as well | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:56 | comment | added | ceejayoz | Ultimately, though, I'm not asking for a blanket ban, but I'm asking if it's generally legitimate to say "this is cPanel-style stuff, close" when someone comes around asking for help with Bitnami appliances. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:48 | comment | added | ceejayoz | Five (not necessarily tagged, but with it in the question text) in the last 24 hours, with maybe one every two weeks prior to that. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:46 | history | answered | HBruijnMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |