Timeline for Commenting on down votes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Aug 30, 2016 at 16:46 | comment | added | SamAndrew81 | Still too subjective. Power/ego-trip on this site is rampant (I don't mean you, just in general). SF needs to adapt or it will die. Spiceworks is already taking over, from what I'm seeing. | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 15:46 | comment | added | HBruijn Mod | interesting enough to answer | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 14:58 | comment | added | SamAndrew81 | Thanks, @HBruijn. I think you stated the issue exactly (at least for my question, in particular): "..found it interesting." This is ridiculously subjective criteria for a question! I am a SysAdmin for a business with on-premise Exchange, so Exchange interests me. However, I have little-to-no BSD experience, so a question you post about UNIX may not interest me in the slightest. Does that mean it's invalid or unworthy of SF? Of course not! | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 14:49 | comment | added | HBruijn Mod | Despite the fact that UI on Meta offers the same explanation as the main site when your mouse hovers over the up and down buttons, on meta votes don't impact your reputation. Down votes should be seen as disagreement to a statement. -|- My background is mainly Linux and Unix and although the question you link does not make my eyes bleed from bad formatting or numerous typo's I also can't determine if it is interesting and worthwhile. My only objective observation is: 1 person found it interesting enough to answer, 5 others decided to cast close votes rather than ignoring it. | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 14:45 | comment | added | SamAndrew81 | Glad to see I'm not alone in my opinion here, far from it actually: meta.serverfault.com/questions/6701/… | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 13:30 | comment | added | SamAndrew81 | You guys can downvote my comment all you like, but I objectively have a valid point that needs to be addressed if you want to be the slightest bit inclusive to newcomers, as Tim said. | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | SamAndrew81 | @HBruijn, Regardless, whomever they are, there was still no justifiable reason for putting my question on hold. Re-read it and tell me if you can find one, but I personally cannot. | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 5:03 | comment | added | HBruijn Mod | The question you link to was not put on hold by any of the moderators (rogue or otherwise) but by 5 different community members... | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 4:34 | history | answered | SamAndrew81 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |