Timeline for Failed a test while reviewing by flagging a question as a duplicate. Now tell me you won't do the same
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 15:57 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | Yes, but the review audit items aren't chosen by a human. They're random high-voted or low-voted posts stuck in the review queue to see if you're randomly mashing buttons for a badge. I don't imagine Stack Exchange is going to hire people to select review audits, so.... | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 19:45 | comment | added | Anubioz | I don't have anything against review audit questions & I successfully passed every one of them before, there also were those "high quality posts" in there. But this particular one is a bad one for including it into test. Since the test shouldn't include something that we can argue on... | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 19:36 | comment | added | Anubioz | Like it requests an advice for memory monitoring tools, which makes yet another reason to flag it as offtopic? Seriously, what's makes you thing it's "detailed", does any question which features command outputs is regarded as "detailed" automatically? :) I can understand that, since compared to 95% of everyday garbage this question DOES seem like a good one, but still without looking at answers I can't see any value in it (just imagine, that I am not supposed to "cheat" by opening the actual question in another tab while reviewing - how would you determine whether it is specific & detailed)... | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 19:25 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |