Timeline for Review audit and I failed, but I disagree. What do I do?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 at 14:10 | comment | added | Jeter-work | <cont> Bottom line, all that above is my opinion, and it obviously differs. Having served and worked in environments where appearances matter, one learns to maintain appearances even in social settings away from work. So, understanding other comments above about this not being a professional setting, I'll continue on, and let the answers do the talking. | |
| May 12, 2017 at 14:05 | comment | added | Jeter-work | I thought the part about 'dependent services' sounded familiar. I do not disagree that there is some impact of restarting the information store. The amount of impact varies on how large the Exchange environment is, how robustly the system is built, and how many users are online at the time of the restart. There are too many variables, AND we don't know exactly what OP was told. Maybe his boss said that the customers would not notice an impact. Telephone game and all that, stories change. My point is that simply stating that "no impact" is incorrect and explaining why focuses on the question. | |
| May 12, 2017 at 9:16 | comment | added | Reaces | If this was a work environment I would go talk to the exchange admins first. Then I'd probably see if I could explain the service to them, find out if maybe I was wrong, and escalate further if needed. I guess the point I'm trying to make is, on a QA your only options are to point out mistakes and give your opinion. You can't follow the tactfully correct route because that's up to the OP. | |
| May 12, 2017 at 0:20 | history | edited | joeqwerty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
| May 12, 2017 at 0:13 | history | answered | joeqwerty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |