7

This tag happens in most cases with raid or with other non-trivial sector-mapped storage solution. But its standalone meaning is at least unclear or too broad.

My suggestion were to

  1. Either delete this tag,
  2. Or rename it to rebuild-raid or raid-rebuild (or to rebuild-storage, or any similar),
  3. Or split this to rebuild-raid, rebuild-crypto, etc.
4
  • It looks like only one question has the rebuild tag and no other tags. I've suggested an edit to add some other tags. Commented Mar 24, 2015 at 17:56
  • Thanks for your time and effort to retags questions with [rebuild] tags. Next time you do it again, please slow it down so the old questions didn't cluttered frontpage. Our mod suggest that you need to keep edits that bump old content to around 2 an hour (or less)
    – masegaloeh
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 12:03
  • Task done. The now unused tag will be automatically deleted in a day. The list of changes can you see here, I hope I didn't committed any destructive. If there is no reaction here, I will accept the most upvoted answer and consider the thing ready.
    – peterh
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 20:19
  • 1
    @masegaloeh I am sorry, I've just now read your comment! Ok, next time I will do it slower.
    – peterh
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 20:19

1 Answer 1

10

Having had a quick look at the 50 questions tagged I'd be inclined to agree with 1. deletion.

It doesn't always appear as though people wanted to use it as etc so just removing it seems like a good option.

1
  • 5
    Agreed - "rebuild" as a tag is less than useless. (WHAT are you rebuilding? A RAID array? A server? A house in Miami?)
    – voretaq7 Mod
    Commented Mar 19, 2015 at 19:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .