It is not often, but it can occur that a post belong to Security Stackexchange.
What about adding it to the migration list ?
It would fit the empty space !
Some examples this week:
-
4If it's not often, then it's not needed.– WesleyCommented Nov 26, 2015 at 19:29
-
4None of those are off topic for SF. The first and last are a bit broad/opinion-based so don't really have a home on SE, so there really isn't a need to migrate them. Please, also, stop leaving comments about $elsewhere being better. That's not necessarily the case, and people saying the same on SO are a real source of irritation here.– user9517Commented Nov 28, 2015 at 12:34
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
We can't add more targets to the migration list (it's an arbitrary hard limit set by the SE staff).
The sites currently on the list (SO, SU, U&L, DBA) are much more important.
Some stats for migration in the last 90 days:
SU: 152
U&L: 79
SO: 37
DBA: 18
SEC: 4
When you think it's really necessary to migrate, raise a flag (the mod might disagree though and reject the flag).
-
2In fact stats aren't really accurate, some posts are not migrated.– FroggizCommented Nov 27, 2015 at 12:44
-
@Froggiz What do you want to say with this? The reject rates are ~10%, this don't change this statistic.– Sven ModCommented Nov 27, 2015 at 13:09
-
That some post which should be migrated are in status closed or even not touched, so they are not in statistics. But yes it is still less than other sites– FroggizCommented Nov 27, 2015 at 13:31