comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
@tombull89 I thought I did raise it on Meta.StackExchange...
awarded
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
When did I say something rude? You are trying to rile me up by claiming two different things all the time. You simply can't admit that EEAA was wrong, and that you are. I DON'T need to create a subdomain for my MX records. MX records and CNAME can't co-exist. You. Are. Wrong.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Because you want to defend your moderator buddy and you want me to say something rude so you can ban me.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Ah, avoiding the question because you know you're gonna look bad if you answer it and contradict earlier statements. Nice one.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Okay. So remind me again why it's not the CNAME record's "fault" that I can't have an MX record? And also, remind me why I need to create a subdomain for my MX record?
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Also: "Your www.example.com CNAME can happily co-exist with MX records"
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Maybe because you literally said they could? Quote: "No, your CNAME is not the reason you can't use MX records." (Not you, but you quoted it.) Your quote: "You don't need a subdomain. The domain example.com itself can have an MX record (and this is the usual setup)."
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Okay. This is beginning to look like another conversation I just had. First you literally say CNAME and MX can co-exist. Then I ask why I need a subdomain if that's the case. Then you say they can't co-exist. Why don't you just ban me, that is clearly your goal here.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Wow. You literally said they can co-exist.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
But his answer claims I do need a subdomain. Which is why we had a back and forth in the first place. But suddenly I'm the stupid one for asking why I need a subdomain if CNAME and MX can co-exist...
awarded
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
@Sven Okay buddy. Oh, it says moderator when I click your name. How surprising!
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
At which point I asked him why I needed a subdomain if that was the case. To which he never answered.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
@MichaelHampton Trolling to ask what I'm getting a warning for? I see where this is going...
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
How surprising that a moderator sticks up for another moderator and abuse their power together!
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
Ah, so I'm not allowed to ask questions to which I don't already have the answer. Gotcha. And no, he didn't explain it.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
@MichaelHampton Ah. What behavior, exactly? What am I getting a warning for? :)
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
LOL! What's the point? Look what happens when I try to reach out. You can't fight corruption by asking the corrupt to change.
comment
Arguing with a moderator always turns out the same way: your question is closed
@Sven So it's not a site where you're allowed to ask server related questions? How strange that my simple question was too hard for one of your moderators then.