since we're not going into specifics, we can't do this everywhere (no meta tags, etc), but I think it would be a good addition

I guess what I'm getting at is what you were alluding to in your disclaimer. What is "easy to understand in 30 seconds"? I've looked at the proposed FAQ again and again, and don't see how it's complicated.

Right, I saw that as I was writing the comment. But it is essentially the majority of the change as proposed here.

Really, the only difference I'm seeing between this and the proposal that was declined is the removal of the tags. I fail to see how this makes it "easier to understand"

maybe salary in conjunction with an area or region, as it can vary from location to location

I'm fine with either. I just want it to look uniform, whatever is decided.

@sysadmin1138 How about 'e.g.'? I get your point, and honestly I was a little torn about having the multiple repetitions, but thought that it was more uniform. Maybe using 'e.g' would satisfy the uniformity issue that I see, while still using something that denotes a non-exclusive list.

We regularly close "What is the best way" questions. I don't see how this would fit.

Clearly, the banners at the top of the page weren't in your face enough.

Try looking through Symantec's BE manual. Holy balls, that thing is ridiculous to get through...