Timeline for Amend an accepted answer to be more correct
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 19, 2011 at 22:48 | comment | added | artifex | Your answer seem to reflect the general consensus. I've therefore marked it. Thank you | |
Aug 19, 2011 at 22:46 | vote | accept | artifex | ||
Aug 19, 2011 at 0:03 | comment | added | Holocryptic | What @voretaq7 said | |
Aug 18, 2011 at 20:24 | comment | added | voretaq7 | I think that's a key distinction between whether it's acceptable or not -- in the cooking.SE post @Holocryptic linked to the intent of the answer was changed: That's definitely not OK. Making it better ("better" being a subjective community standard) isn't a bad thing. | |
Aug 18, 2011 at 20:16 | comment | added | Ben Pilbrow | Yeah, I agree. Were I not just about to get food, I'd have written pretty much the same thing. I've done it before, and make no excuses for it, provided you're not changing the intent of the post, like you say. | |
Aug 18, 2011 at 20:11 | history | answered | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |