Timeline for Can we black hole the "errors" tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2011 at 11:30 | comment | added | MDMarra | @RebeccaChernoff I think that it's already been manually retagged. It's the kind of tag that people will recreate. | |
| Nov 11, 2011 at 6:25 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff Mod | Only a handful of questions tagged [errors]. Perhaps retagging those so the tag goes away "voluntarily" would be enough, without blacklisting the tag? | |
| Nov 2, 2011 at 23:28 | answer | added | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 2, 2011 at 23:07 | comment | added | voretaq7 | "errors" seems to be a uniquely useless tag (arguably worse than apache) -- In furtherance of this goal I've updated the tag wiki/excerpt to ask people not to use errors and instead describe the error message in the body of their question. | |
| Nov 2, 2011 at 23:00 | answer | added | voretaq7 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 2, 2011 at 22:46 | answer | added | MikeyB | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 2, 2011 at 22:19 | history | asked | MDMarra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |