Timeline for Is it possible to make a post "sticky"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2012 at 22:19 | vote | accept | John Gardeniers | ||
| Jan 30, 2012 at 21:11 | comment | added | Zypher Mod | @JohnGardeniers sorry was responding to Mark's answer and not your feature request. I believe a similar "sticky thread" request brought about the featured tag. | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @Zypher, I'm not really talking about a system message though. I'm talking about a way to (temporarily) keep a post at the top of the page, which amongst other things is a lot less annoying. | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 20:51 | comment | added | Zypher Mod | @JohnGardeniers honestly no, not for a non-dismisable system message (although to be fair we don't have a good alternative). IMNSHO Those messages should only be for critical things that everyone MUST know about like the sites are going down at x time, we are in read only mode, etc. | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 20:42 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @Zypher, so you don't think the election and FAQ discussion are important enough? | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 18:43 | comment | added | Zypher Mod | Please don't abuse of the system notice makes people ignore it, then they miss important things, like downtime notifications | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 4:24 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Would it be worth requesting it as a feature? I've been monitoring the FAQ question and feel it deserves more prominence than "ordinary" posts. | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 3:27 | history | answered | Mark HendersonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |