Timeline for FAQ Rewrite edit round 1
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2012 at 19:47 | comment | added | Holocryptic | I'm fine with either. I just want it to look uniform, whatever is decided. | |
| Feb 6, 2012 at 6:32 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod |
We could also just tack "etc." onto the end of each line (Operating systems: ........, etc.) -- That makes it obvious the list isn't exhaustive and avoids "pause phrases".
|
|
| Feb 5, 2012 at 16:00 | history | edited | Holocryptic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
use e.g. instead.
|
| Feb 5, 2012 at 3:48 | comment | added | Holocryptic | @sysadmin1138 How about 'e.g.'? I get your point, and honestly I was a little torn about having the multiple repetitions, but thought that it was more uniform. Maybe using 'e.g' would satisfy the uniformity issue that I see, while still using something that denotes a non-exclusive list. | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 2:55 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | When I put that in the original edit process I struggled with that. Three repetitions of 'including' or 'such as' gets tiring, and I couldn't think of a third option to replace the second 'including'. I just don't know which is better. | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 1:32 | history | answered | Holocryptic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |