Timeline for Improving versus Closing -- Help bad askers help themselves!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2012 at 15:56 | vote | accept | voretaq7 | ||
| Feb 25, 2012 at 6:10 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | Seems like a good idea to me -- I think oneboxing the crap and posting links with a little note about stuff that can possibly be improved/saved could work as a way to distinguish the questions. | |
| Feb 24, 2012 at 13:11 | comment | added | the-wabbit | @Ward better yet, mark them with an Imp symbol. | |
| Feb 24, 2012 at 12:57 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | I've renamed VTC Improve or Close lets see how this goes. | |
| Feb 24, 2012 at 4:46 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | Re-purposing VTC would probably work, but I think any posts nominated for improving would have to be very clearly marked. Right now, the people who post in VTC typically put only very terse notes about what they think is wrong with a post, it might not work if improvable posts are marked something like "imp." | |
| Feb 23, 2012 at 21:14 | comment | added | EEAA | Great idea, @SvenW. | |
| Feb 23, 2012 at 21:03 | comment | added | Sven | VTC could be renamed to Improve or Close or something like that and handle both cases, since the close traffic is quite low. | |
| Feb 23, 2012 at 20:40 | history | answered | John Gardeniers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
