Timeline for Topicality: What should be done with "hobbyist" firmware questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2014 at 17:50 | answer | added | kasperd | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2012 at 16:07 | answer | added | MDMarra | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 26, 2012 at 8:14 | comment | added | Rob Moir | As much as I think each of those firmware/distro/whatevers is a waste of good bytes based on my experiences with all of them, I don't think we should mark things as automatically OT because we don't think they're up to scratch. Because apart from anything else, I bet we've all got little lists of other technology that wouldn't be missed, and at that point we're on a dangerous road. | |
| Feb 26, 2012 at 1:15 | answer | added | the-wabbit | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 22:19 | answer | added | Shane Madden | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 21:17 | history | asked | user62491 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |