Timeline for Questions with favourites tags: can you make the background darker?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 10:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 18, 2012 at 22:59 | answer | added | John Gardeniers | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 18, 2012 at 17:11 | answer | added | user9517Mod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 18, 2012 at 4:40 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Yeah... That's the standard line of bull stuff we've been hearing for years now. This is why commitments only ever mean something when they have a date attached. =[ | |
| Aug 18, 2012 at 4:09 | comment | added | Zypher Mod | @chris soory that was in humor. It is on the design teams list to eventually look at the trillogy | |
| Aug 18, 2012 at 2:46 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | @Zypher Fair enough, but don't say that "we're looking at it" or similarly misleading statements (not you personally; as a figure of speech). I'd disagree with "We're not changing it, evar", but it irks me when people say one thing and do another, just as bad as the "suggestion box" black hole. | |
| Aug 17, 2012 at 17:49 | comment | added | Zypher Mod | Or, it's because our designer is scared to touch the trilogy ... | |
| Aug 17, 2012 at 15:29 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Related meta.serverfault.com/questions/1745 meta.serverfault.com/questions/1285 and meta.serverfault.com/questions/tagged/design Apparently the design team has high contrast monitors and good eyesight. The look of the sight has been an outstanding "issue" for a long time, nothing has changed, when asked about it "they" have said it's on their list (along with all the other suggestions that have been ignored). | |
| Aug 17, 2012 at 15:22 | history | edited | voretaq7Mod |
Retag with [design] ; remove [favorites] & [color] singleton tags
|
|
| Aug 17, 2012 at 15:17 | history | asked | quanta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |