Timeline for Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2012 at 21:25 | comment | added | Rob Moir | @nils Your experiences are not the whole world. While I'm quite happy to collect a bounty for a question should I provide an answer and there's one to be had, I've personally never bothered looking in the bounty queue for questions to answer, and from the answer patterns of many of the long term regulars, I suspect I'm far from alone. | |
| Sep 1, 2012 at 20:14 | comment | added | Nils | @DJPon3 Citation? This is selv-experience. Perhaps my questions are too complex (one of this was not even my question)? This seems to be a common behaviour on every site - first scan the bounty-questions - then go for the rest. So a bounty question gets more attention (which is intended) but on SF I have the feeling that there is not enough attention for non-bounty-questions. | |
| Sep 1, 2012 at 15:01 | comment | added | Rob Moir | @nils "But currently the only way to get a proper answer is to set a bounty to a question." [Citation Needed] | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 20:38 | comment | added | Nils | Understand me right - SF is great. But currently the only way to get a proper answer is to set a bounty to a question. I do not think that this is normal. | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 21:33 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |