Timeline for How can I remove my ban on asking questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 at 3:50 | history | edited | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added the 1 q/6 months point
|
| Jun 1, 2017 at 22:54 | comment | added | Cristian Scutaru | Just wondering: you all use terms such as "poor quality", which is a rather subjective term. When it is all about some votes (not many). I only suspect it's possible that even some veterans here could let their friends know (totally legit) about their questions, to eventually vote them up. I'm not talking about fake accounts, voting rings, fiverr paid people or armies of spammers. But why was this possible method never mentioned in current context? | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 19, 2013 at 19:19 | comment | added | Rob Moir | I think you guys have taken a rather militant stance on this. - these bans are automated. Nothing to do with either high rep members or even the mods. Why is it that when you down vote that you're not FORCED to explain why? You've been pointed towards meta.stackoverflow as an authoratative source for this but one simple reason: if you force people to comment as part of a vote then either people won't vote (which is bad) or they'll comment with something like 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' which is no better than no comment at all. | |
| Jul 19, 2013 at 13:46 | history | edited | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added note on answering questions
|
| Jul 19, 2013 at 8:58 | comment | added | Jacques | I just discovered I'm banned too. I think you guys have taken a rather militant stance on this. Why is it that when you down vote that you're not FORCED to explain why? I asked a very simple question because I'd researched it but was getting conflicting answers. It was downvoted but I can't see by who and they're not explaining why! | |
| Nov 25, 2012 at 14:39 | vote | accept | KK Patel | ||
| Nov 24, 2012 at 11:47 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | Looking at the evidence, this is most likely to be the poster's problem. This is a hard box to get out of. | |
| Nov 24, 2012 at 7:51 | history | answered | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |