Timeline for Processing the Review / Late Answers queue
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Dec 16, 2012 at 8:56 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 15, 2012 at 15:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/279978540974354432 | ||
| Dec 15, 2012 at 6:22 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | I thought that queue was for all late answers, not just those by new users. | |
| Dec 15, 2012 at 6:18 | history | edited | John Gardeniers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2012 at 0:25 | answer | added | HopelessN00b | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 15, 2012 at 0:22 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | Looks like this has been completed. There is now a "No Action Needed" option. | |
| Dec 14, 2012 at 16:41 | comment | added | Shog9 | It's already been brought up on MSO, several times in fact. I'm... softening toward the idea. | |
| Dec 14, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | Unless you have a strong objection I'm going to kick this to mSO because it really is a flaw (possibly Broken As Designed) in the /review system's late answers queue that affects all sites. It will get more attention there (and this discussion may have already happened and I've just missed it). | |
| Dec 14, 2012 at 14:16 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | That crap gets flagged all the time too; welcome to our (mods) dilemma. As you've stated it's certainly not good enough for an upvote, but not quite bad enough to get baleted. If feels like you should do something about it... | |
| Dec 14, 2012 at 12:44 | history | asked | user11604 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |