Timeline for Who declines flags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2013 at 22:40 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | @ChrisS: It looks like declining the first flag declines all flags thrown on a post - interesting. I too would like to see VLQ removed especially as it is most often thrown without any evidence of attempting to improve the post by for example leaving a comment requesting a fix up by the OP, downvoting etc. | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 16:46 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @ChrisS I'm in the "bad answers have an important place in instructing people what NOT to do" camp, and I think it should be left around... | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 16:05 | history | edited | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2013 at 15:59 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | +1 Spam flags show up in the 10K view. Offensive are Mod only. But that was actually 3 flags, two for offensive and another for very low quality. I declined the 'very low quality' flag as I couldn't see any way to improve the answer and I didn't think it was so bad that it needed to be deleted. I wish they'd get rid of the VLQ flag as it's rarely helpful. I don't know what happened to the offensive flags (it doesn't say...). Perhaps it could be removed on grounds of being wholly unprofessional? | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 14:16 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod |
The flag-text reads: This answer contains content that a reasonable person would consider offensive, abusive, or hate speech. This is not a flag for, technically wrong to the point of offense. It is a flag for Egregious lack of decorum and poor judgment in language.
|
|
| Jan 6, 2013 at 14:06 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | Spam flags are shown in the 10K tools view, Offensive is another animal though. | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 13:15 | vote | accept | Tom O'Connor | ||
| Jan 6, 2013 at 13:13 | history | answered | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |