Timeline for Can we do anything to change the dynamic of the site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| May 25, 2013 at 6:49 | comment | added | Falcon Momot | Is it possible that anyone, 1-2 years into server admin, can't troubleshoot a simple HTTP error? Criminal. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 21:12 | vote | accept | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | ||
| May 16, 2013 at 20:16 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | Of course, even as I wrote that, I was thinking of the endless posts on meta.SO "Why can't I ask questions?" where people claim to have read the post that explains the question ban... | |
| May 16, 2013 at 20:15 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | Maybe all we need is a few agreed-on closing reasons (like your list, maybe a couple more) and corresponding meta Q&A to point people to. VtClose as NARQ, throw in a comment "Your question doesn't include enough information. See (link) for ideas on what needs to be improved in your question to get it reopened and answered." | |
| May 16, 2013 at 19:44 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | The key with closure or downvoting as an enforcement tool as there needs to be some feedback to the user -- the forthcoming changes to close votes (including custom per-site close reasons) will help with that. | |
| May 16, 2013 at 19:42 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | I, of course, like "Downvote" and "Vote to Close" as methods of enforcement. Maybe combined with firm but not snarky "standard" comments. | |
| May 16, 2013 at 19:25 | comment | added | gWaldo | I'm good with all of this. | |
| May 16, 2013 at 18:53 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |