Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
May 29, 2013 at 21:51 answer added Zoredache timeline score: 1
May 29, 2013 at 21:33 comment added Tom O'Connor Mod See, the problem I have with questions like this, is they're largely subjective. Only the OP can know whether their system is performing as they'd like, and only they can accurately devise benchmarks to prove it either does or doesn't meet their needs. From a generalistic point of view, it's effectively the same as the capacity planning canonical question, but I suspect, from the OP's POV, they're looking for something decidedly more specific. However, without vastly more information, it's difficult to answer in a way that'll meet expectations across the board.
May 29, 2013 at 17:58 comment added Hauke Laging @ChrisS This is not "capacity planning" vs. "performance planning". If that was the only difference then I would be with you. The questioner asks a very specific software question whereas the other question and their answers are both very broad and about hardware. The main point is: I don't see how the other answers help the questioner in any way.
May 29, 2013 at 17:45 comment added Hauke Laging @lain I did not intend to indicate that the mod wanted to get more reputation. I can understand that one's own answers are more on one's mind.
May 29, 2013 at 17:43 answer added voretaq7Mod timeline score: 6
May 29, 2013 at 17:41 comment added Chris S Mod Capacity and Performance are pretty darn close to the same thing to me. Perhaps it would help if you explained specifically why you think they're "seriously" different. (downvote is not mine)
May 29, 2013 at 17:41 comment added user9517 The Q&A was written as dupe target for the many capacity planning questions we get, as such the answer was made CW and attracts no reputation for it's author.
May 29, 2013 at 17:30 history asked Hauke Laging CC BY-SA 3.0