Timeline for I'd like a settings option or StackApp that allows me to filter what I see on the site
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 17, 2013 at 6:48 | comment | added | the-wabbit | @voretaq7 it looks very much like if filtering is not being provided, it will be created as a browser add-on or a StackApp. It already is rather easy to craft a query allowing filtering on just anything using data.SE, it seems just like the matter of time before anybody gets annoyed enough to implement it for the live data. | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 18:28 | comment | added | user9517 | Just in case you hadn't noticed, I'm not having a great time playing SF at the moment. I'm still the third highest voter this year, this simply won't work. There are fewer than 300 people who have v-t-c privilege and less then 25% of them exercise it with any regularity. There is far too much 'work' being required of too few people. | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:46 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @syneticon-dj In practice that's not how it seems to work out -- All SE sites develop a core of "active regulars" who would be over the threshold (and presumably filtering), and a sea of changing "occasional" and "newbie" users -- Those in the sea are usually not active reviewers (less invested in the site), and those who can filter have no incentive to review because they don't see the crap. | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:20 | comment | added | the-wabbit | If we allowed filtering by rep there would be a pile of crap from 1-rep accounts that nobody ever sees: this is rather easy to handle by requiring users to complete a certain number of reviews to earn this privilege. | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 15:22 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod |
@Iain [linux] score:4 is about the closest approximation to "good questions in linux" -- I agree it's suboptimal though: your frontpage is still a disaster, and you only see linux questions in that view. something that lets us filter favorite tags by score (maybe [*Favorites] score:N?) would be a nice feature addition.
|
|
| Aug 16, 2013 at 6:37 | comment | added | user9517 | This doesn't really work. For example I want to see good questions in linux but it is also a river of shit so ignoring it gets me nowhere ... | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 4:27 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | Further to my edit... It's awesome to see that other people have been downvoting the (many) crappy close:yes score:0 answers:0 questions I mentioned in a previous meta.SF question. And once they're at -1, the auto-delete is nuking them. Yay! | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 4:25 | history | edited | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
emphasized the voting bit
|
| Aug 15, 2013 at 22:20 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |