Timeline for Canonisation Request: Why put a reverse proxy in front of a WSGI server?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2013 at 20:55 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @syneticon-dj If it is not generalized it is FAR too specific for canonization. More importantly, "What are some advantages of doing X?" / "Why might I want to consider a configuration like X?" are squarely in the realm of Good Subjective -- asking for well-reasoned detailed responses that explain the Why as opposed to just "What do you like better?" | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 19:28 | comment | added | the-wabbit | @voretaq7 if it is generalized to "what are some advantages", it becomes subjective, no longer a real problem and thus off-topic. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 16:08 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | Agreed. If the question is generalized ("What are some advantages of using a reverse proxy in front of a web application?") and the answer expanded with some more detail on the differences between a reverse proxy and a simple load balancing solution I think this is a good candidate, but it needs work first... | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 12:45 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |