Timeline for Serial close-voting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 16, 2013 at 2:50 | answer | added | Jonesome Reinstate Monica | timeline score: -13 | |
| Oct 15, 2013 at 15:34 | vote | accept | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | ||
| Oct 15, 2013 at 15:26 | answer | added | Magellan | timeline score: 14 | |
| Oct 12, 2013 at 3:04 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | @Magellan Your comments here and in chat have pretty much convinced me... I accept that you're voting reasonably even if I vote differently on a fair # of the ones you've voted to close. If you feel like it, you could compile a few of your thoughts into an answer and I'll probably accept it. If you don't want to bother, I'll try to compile something and answer myself. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 22:59 | comment | added | Magellan | @SvW You address one of my issues perfectly. If a question can be solved by a simple Google search with a quoted string, it's too elementary for ServerFault and needs to be punted. 80% of what I flagged I feel falls under the category of n00b question. If you disagree, you ALL are free to disagree and vote accordingly. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 22:26 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/388792847098716160 | ||
| Oct 11, 2013 at 21:21 | comment | added | Sven | @Magellan: I absolutely don't understand how you come to this conclusion. That users' question are usually clearly formulated, well formatted and easy to understand, she answers requests for clarification and votes and accepts answers. Granted, some questions are on the noobish side and maybe could be self-solved with a little bit more of google-fu, but I prefer those questions over 99% of the random crap by user0815 any day. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 20:29 | comment | added | Magellan | Granted, I'm the one going through and closing the crap from the user, but that's what the review queue is for. If you think the questions should be left open, I encourage you to vote to do so. That's why it takes 5 votes to close. Personally, I think tha user posts crap so frequently that they're abusing the system and many of them should simply be outright deleted. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 20:07 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | No, I'm talking about someone who is going back through a particular users old questions and voting to close those. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 20:01 | comment | added | Zoredache | Do keep in mind that many users often visit the site at a particular time of day. The asker/closer could just be using the site at the same times? I know I have closed multiple questions from a single user in the past. This isn't me stalking them, it is just a coincidence of them asking questions I think don't belong here at a time I am looking at the site. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 19:50 | answer | added | voretaq7Mod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 19:41 | history | asked | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |