Timeline for Pretty low standard for "constructive" comments
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Nov 3, 2013 at 2:30 | vote | accept | EEAA | ||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 23:43 | answer | added | Michael HamptonMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 9:01 | history | edited | Falcon Momot |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 1, 2013 at 22:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/396403124971511808 | ||
| Nov 1, 2013 at 19:22 | comment | added | Jonesome Reinstate Monica | @EEAA OK, I misread your direction. However I am in the same place as you are vis-a-vis "In the face of the numerous "THE SKY IS FALLING" threads on meta recently, I've been trying to remain engaged and optimistic. " | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 19:21 | comment | added | EEAA | @samsmith - ok that's just silly. Please re-read my question. It has nothing to do with what you're suggesting. Looking at the downvotes on your past meta posts, it looks like either 1) you really don't understand SF's charter or 2) you desire a significantly different SF than the community wants. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 19:17 | comment | added | Jonesome Reinstate Monica | EEAA : You are absolutely correct. SF has raised the bar too high, and is far to quick to close threads for rather silly reasons (I saw one closed because the user was using vmware PLAYER, which was considered not a real sysadmin tool -- please!) Thank you for raising this issue. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 18:00 | answer | added | voretaq7Mod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 17:43 | answer | added | Chris SMod | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 17:39 | history | edited | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Include the whole question, 'cuz it's crap and I'm deleting it...
|
| Nov 1, 2013 at 17:35 | comment | added | EEAA | @Iain - that's unfortunate to hear. Prior to today, I've always thought that my flags (comments and otherwise) were handled well. Immediately before the above incident, I had flagged a different comment (from the same user) for containing misinformation about SF topicality. That flag was declined as well, but the comment in question was edited by the moderator to remove the misinformation. Doesn't make any sense why that should have been declined. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 17:31 | comment | added | user9517 | FWIW I've pretty much quit flagging stuff because I flagged a (moderators) comment NC and it was declined but the whole comment thread was subsequently cleaned up (as in overnight). | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 17:13 | history | asked | EEAA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |