Timeline for Why does the careers 2.0 site cater to programmers only?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2015 at 22:01 | comment | added | Pacerier | @MichaelHampton, @ WillCole, Are sysadmins and programmers the only targeted audience? What about DBAs, PMs, and QAs? | |
| Jan 9, 2014 at 22:09 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Another problem here is that sysadmins may or may not have sufficient reputation on SO, or activity on Github/Codeplex to qualify to sign up. I think some other means of qualifying sysadmins to sign up needs to be found. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 20:49 | comment | added | Andrew B | It's capital vs. opex all over again. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 17:27 | comment | added | Magellan | Hope it goes better than the last 2 or 3 times the FAQ/Help system has come up for revision...... | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 16:45 | comment | added | Will Cole Staff | @andrewb Fair enough. Minor in the context of making sure the SF community knew they were welcome in the CV database. Reading your answer here too, I see your point on the general marketing towards programmers. That is not something we want to address now for several reasons. It's a complicated message to get across to employers, and the current system of working closely with our clients with their hiring needs works really well. If a sys admin position is needed, we help them through the process of searching and posting jobs in the correct way. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 16:24 | comment | added | Andrew B | I'm not sure about this being "minor", considering how pervasive the verbiage is across the site. It's reassuring to hear though. Can you confirm that the automatic invites are keyed to SO activity, and not SF? If so, will this be changing? | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 15:10 | history | answered | Will ColeStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |