Timeline for Is this the kind of language we should be promoting on SF
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014 at 16:13 | vote | accept | user9517 | ||
| Feb 12, 2014 at 3:47 | comment | added | Steve Shipway | +1 from me too. If necessary, it is perfectly possibly to politely imply the boss in question has the IQ of a small gherkin without having to resort to profanity or playground language. And, it is often more effective when done politely... | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 14:12 | comment | added | Scott Pack | @Nick: This topic comes up with unfortunate regularity. | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 2:48 | comment | added | Nick | Agreed. I've also seen this attitude leak into commentary about people in the thread (not as explicitly). I've flagged more comments as rude/unconstructive on ServerFault than on all of the other SE sites put together. I'm glad to see suggestions for ways to improve that trend. | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 0:19 | comment | added | Watt | +1. Very eloquently put Sir. BTW, the original text just shows juvenile and frustrated nature of the commenter, which is not adding any. | |
| Feb 4, 2014 at 13:32 | comment | added | Scott Pack | Yes, this. All of this. | |
| Feb 4, 2014 at 9:26 | history | edited | Falcon Momot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2014 at 9:01 | history | answered | Falcon Momot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |